You Never Know When You Might Need A Zero ([info]ms_xeno) wrote,
@ 2008-08-05 07:40:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:eat the duopoly, electoral reform, green party, war is a racket

Fear For Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner...
...and I'm still hungry, damnit !!

"...We are supposed to believe that if Senator McCain wins this election, we will be subject to another four years of Bush policies. I deeply believe that if we continue to support these two political parties that have worked together to eviscerate the 1st Amendment by setting up 'Free Speech Zones' for demonstrators and tasering people that ask questions of our politicians and gutting the 4th Amendment by passing the FISA law, things will indeed get worse. These are developments that happened recently, I could write pages on how our rights under the Constitution have been violated in the past decade. If we continue to support the duopoly, after all that has happened, what incentive will they have for listening to the people? They will see it as a green-light to continue their anti-democratic behavior."



"Even if McCain wins the presidency because of defections from the Democrats, once McCain realizes that it was a third party candidate that was responsible for Obama’s defeat, he must realize that the GOP will be the peoples next target. I believe that Cynthia McKinney, because of her ballot access in 40 States and possibly all 50 by the election, would be the best option. If the Democrats saw their loss as directly attributable to her, don’t you believe that the next Democratic candidate would be infinitely better than the corporate shill they are offering now?..." -- Timothy V. Gatto at LiberalPro, 8/4/08.


Personally I have my doubts about that second paragraph. Gatto maintains a steadfast faith that Democrats, decisively shown the error of their ways, will act to save their party by acting to save us. My own stance is that Democrats have zero interest in doing anything but expanding upon that corner of the trough which they have already carved out for themselves-- and beating the tar out of anyone who threatens it. Worrying about our feelings is not on their agenda, as we have long been regarded as their wholly-owned property. Since when did property have any feelings ?

But some good reading there, nonetheless. Borrowed from the feed at On The Wilder Side.



(2 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]al_schumann
2008-08-08 12:51 am UTC (link)
I'm with you on the doubts about the second para. The Democrats -- from the auditioning pundit-wannabes harvesting the rank and file, straight up to the sinecured struttin' dudes crowing at each on the gilded shit hill -- cannot respond to events with a broadly enlightened self-interest, at this point in time. I wouldn't absolutely rule out the possibility that they'll develop the capacity of doing so, at some distant point in the future. But they have no need to do so and the opinion leaders are making good money maintaining the system that makes sure they don't need to. Who's going to take a chance on being picked off by a hungrier wannabe? Best for the rest of us to just let them gnaw on each other and spend our political energy elsewhere.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ms_xeno
2008-08-08 07:53 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, that's pretty much my opinion. However, there is some amusement to be had. Watching Smithee over at Political Fleshfeast as he hurls buckets of moldering trash at the wannabee wannabees, for instance.

Edited at 2008-08-08 07:54 pm UTC

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(2 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…