You Never Know When You Might Need A Zero ([info]ms_xeno) wrote,
@ 2006-08-16 13:40:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:eat the duopoly, electoral reform, music

If You Can't Lie No Better Than That...*
You Might As Well Tell The Truth.

With the philosophy portion is out of the way, The Crank finally weighs in on Lieberpalooza '06. It's not as though there were any rush. His constituents' public rebuke was long overdue and sadly limited in scope, considering how many of his imitators are free to carry on as they always have. This holds true regardless of whether he ends up winning or not.

In fact, I had hoped to link to a particular/typical clump of Democratic faithful denial that I stepped in barefoot last Sunday morning. Serves me right for knowing it wasn't the proper neighborhood for The Crank to be touring in the first place. Unfortunately, I couldn't locate it again today. All this stuff blurs together over time. You'll have to forgive me on grounds that I have never aspired to be a big-name red-toothed blogger/journalist. Or because you know me to have all the computer savvy of a freshly-canned snail.

Along with the obligatory sneer at He Who Must (Or Need) Not Be Named Again, came a sentimental bleat that revealed more than its writer meant it to. Her/his claim was that as long as the DP remains the party of Waters, Kucinich, and the other legions [sic] of compassionate proggies, it would be churlish and cruel for "us" to leave the DP. When they head out, said Sentimental Lady/Gentleman, it will be time for us to head out.+ Well, I've never been one to avoid kicking one leg out from under an argument that was built missing the other three anyway. Spare me, Ms/Mr. Sentimental.


Having been a bona fide Sucker for Kucinich back in '04, I speak from experience. The person who wrote this passive-aggressive twaddle knows damn well that the in-house proggies aren't going anywhere. Why not ? Who knows ? Maybe they enjoy posing as beleaguered rebels in an environment that requires them to deliver exactly nothing to truly further Progressive causes, at least at the national level. Maybe they like being well-paid tools whose primary function is to lend the DP cred that its masters do nothing to earn. Maybe they are exceptionally prized behind the scenes for their crucial role in getting the Sentimentals herded, trussed, muzzled and closeted whenever the shit threatens to hit the fan (ie- national conventions). Maybe the Party leaders have a file with pictures of Kucinich, et al smoking pot arm in arm with the Culkin brothers at the Neverland ranch in 1989, and they wave the negatives in Denny's face every time he gets uppity.

There are probably as many reasons why the prominent "good Demos" stay as there are stars in the sky. Frankly, who gives a fuck ? Fact is, they aren't leaving, and Sentimental Lady/Gentleman knows it, too. SL/G's statement of steely resolve is thus a self-aware lie about people who have allowed their careers to devolve into a meaningless exercise . One of being a well-paid, well-compensated "conscience" for a party that feels no moral obligation whatsoever to anything but its own bloated wallet.

Biting into this sugar-coated morsel of festering tripe in the context of Lieberman having his wrist belatedly slapped, and his subsequent temper tantrums, is hilarious. Every liberal's discussion of such specimens has some breathless qualifier that He Who Must Not Be Named is yet unforgivably evil because of the 2000 campaign hype that claimed no important differences between Dems and the GOP. I have heard multiple times now that it was less Senator Shithead's policies and more his public cuddling with Bush that got him a chance to be canned. Does this mean that even hype has a core of truth to it ? Lieberman was "different" than Santorum but not "different enough."

Sorry, Mr/Ms Sentimental, but you are busted. I told you seven years ago that whatever differences exist would not be enough to save our asses. Looks like you're finally coming around, a little. Too bad that you can't just come out and say it. Or you can only say it through a token who, BTW, isn't lying down just because you've told him he's dead.

The Crank hopes that the whole thing begins a new era of DP profiling. Maybe some snappy posters of Joe with a line through him saying "A Little Difference Ain't Enough Difference." How about DiFi or HRC with the words "More Difference Wanted. Apply Here." emblazoned across her thousand dollar suit ? It could happen. And The Crank could win at Powerball, too. Without even bothering to buy a ticket.


+I'll put five-to-one odds on this clown having an "If The People Lead, The Leaders Will Follow" bumper sticker on his/her car, too.
*With humble thanks to Delbert McClinton, and also to Deborah Coleman. It was her last CD which introduced me to the song.



(Post a new comment)

Prog rot is a terrible thing
[info]jalvascruggs
2006-08-17 09:10 am UTC (link)
I liked Kucinich for a while too. I lost a great deal of respect for him when he handed all his supporters and their work over to the feckless Windsurfer. That's no way to drive change! I think he and the other Decent Democrats hang around because they can't figure out what else to do. Inertia, the threat of insecurity, maybe the slim hopes of forestalling something awful. I dunno.

That bumper sticker slogan comes awfully close to being sensible. Leaders elbow their way to the head of the parade, if they're allowed, then they club the fluffy bunnies, one by one, until they're entrenched.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Prog rot is a terrible thing
[info]ms_xeno
2006-08-19 02:54 pm UTC (link)
Not the fluffy bunnies !! (snif !)

...the threat of insecurity, maybe the slim hopes of forestalling something awful...

There's a direct connection between these two. I sense that most of the time, they do consider their own insecurities more important than those of us they claim to represent. Even though Kucinich having to live off his saved salary for a couple of years and an umemployed checker having to do it aren't really in the same league. Everyone pretends it's the same, though, in the name of good manners. Hence my wish to set up some kind of permanent prank site where we could routinely threaten to strip away Congress' perpetual armor of near-automatic raises, free healthcare, and the like. I think the level of... uh, personal growth provided by such reforms would do the system a world of good.

I was hoping to get mr_xeno to launch a parallel effort on Kos, in order to jump-start a hands-across-the-sea movement between Progs and Cranks.

Then I remembered that I'd left a pot of pasta on the stove.

BTW, [info]kiplet says he knows you...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Prog rot is a terrible thing
[info]jalvascruggs
2006-08-19 08:00 pm UTC (link)
BTW, kiplet says he knows you...

Thanks for the prompt. I mutualized it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]skelkins
2006-08-18 12:24 am UTC (link)
I am so glad you have a ranting space of your own now! Your rants always warm the cockles of my cold, black, shrivelled little heart.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ms_xeno
2006-08-19 02:55 pm UTC (link)
Don't gimme' that "cold, black shrivelled" stuff !! You have Steve The Cat on your lap right this minute !! Confess !!! =^..^=

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]skelkins
2006-08-19 09:46 pm UTC (link)
No, but I have a Mosley at my feet!

Mainly, I have a cold heart because I'm always listening sympathetically to Amp's Laments For Civility, while secretly hoping that you'll spread more lovely anti-Dem vitriol all over his blog. This is quite nasty and hypocritical of me, I suppose. Bad me.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ms_xeno
2006-08-20 03:28 am UTC (link)
He lives !!

(I last recall seeing Mosley's skittish rear end disappear behind a sofa or shrub, oh, about 3-5 years ago.)

Amp swears to me that some of his friends thought my posts in his space were you under another name. I was flabbergasted. Wouldn't my total non-contribution to any and all Harry Potter threads have been a sure sign of this being impossible ?

Tsk.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]skelkins
2006-08-21 08:30 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, a number of my friends from the HP fandom also assumed that 'alsis' was me. I found it quite flattering.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ms_xeno
2006-08-22 04:01 pm UTC (link)
:o

I think the name change may have added to the tendency for higher flames, however. I could be wrong. We could just swap handles for a week and watch the fireworks. Anything to appease post-vacation boredom.

:p

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]skelkins
2006-08-24 05:35 pm UTC (link)
People would probably suspect something was up when you started launching into vitriolic diatribes about the state of on-line media fandom these days, while I stopped being so damned polite to everyone who annoys the crap out of me.

Huh. Come to think of it? I want to be you. Maybe I should create a new persona.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ms_xeno
2006-08-29 12:49 am UTC (link)
Think twice before you initiate the transformation. ;) One of my problems after all that time on Amp's blog is that I have lost the ability to even know when I'm being rude enough to merit shabby treatment and when I'm not. bean and squid have done their best to coach me on technique, NOTA knows... Except... except... I miss the good old days when I was just a proud asshole 24/7 and there was never any doubt when I deserved a drubbing and when I didn't.

Tekanji, for instance. So much of what she posts is awesome, but that whole "truce" thing got on my nerves in a major way and I feel that she shut the thread down prematurely. A lot of what she perceived as vitriol and flaming struck me as pretty low-key compared to some of the wars I've seen in the past. Not just in Amp's space, either. I could tell early in that piny would have my head on a pike in his own space, but I was too busy and distracted to try and do anything to stop it. Still pisses me off, though.

BTW, I did really enjoy the piece about dynamics in female-dominated space. I just didn't comment because by the time I got to your journal, all the interesting stuff has already been said. Most of my one-time fannish/hobby enclaves were male-dominated, and I got boxed into the den mother/kid sister role, which has its own big, big problems. But it's good to know that expecting utopia in a female-dominated space would have been just as naive as expecting it in a male-dominated space turned out to be.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]belledame222
2006-10-15 08:12 pm UTC (link)
former Deaniac here. at least...eh, not worth going into.

I must confess that after '04 and particularly after this last bullshit wrt Habeas Corpus (i.e. crickets crickets crickets send more money! crickets money! crickets MONEY MONEY WE NEED MORE MONEY FROM YOOOUUU), i am feeling increasingly less and less inclined to settle for "hold my nose." I just don't know what the viable option is. I am open to suggestions.

but i mean, my problem with He Who Must Not is that he's a fucking puritan, and for all that he may indeed turn out to be right it's not any thanks to him; "heightening the contradictions" has -not- done any such thing; and i gotta say it, but it's just barely possible that the D's have become *so* used to being losers that that's why they act like all the marrow's been sucked out of their spine, or part of it, some of them: frankly, it's fucking demoralizing.

as per the third party options, if one in this country -ever- emerges that isn't either 1) the brainchild of an eccentric billionaire or 2) nuttier than last year's fruitcake and/or incapable of negotiating its way out of a grease-proof paper bag, let alone actually getting anyone, like, in national office, then I'll rconsider throwing in with them. till then: show me the money.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ms_xeno
2006-10-15 10:21 pm UTC (link)
It seems to me that most of the current crop is very good. I've been a fan of Zeese, for instance, who's running in Maryland, since he worked on The Unnamed One's campaign in '04. I think he'd be a fine candidate. Chretien, too.

The thing is, they won't get into national office so long as people act like they've got cooties and refuse to even give them the time of day unless they do something goofy. That's pure circular logic, and not to be taken seriously, at least not by me.

Anyone who can spend an hour reading Zeese's writings on Democracy Rising's blog and come back later with a straight face to tell me that he's somehow nuttier than a guy like Lieberman is not worth my time. People like that are saying the things and calling for the actions that proggies claim to want like a thirsty person wants water. But the pool is right there, and they still refuse to drink from it for fear of looking silly.

As you have probably gathered by this point, I could give a rat's ass if people think I'm silly. It's remarkably freeing, once you learn to stop giving a shit.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]belledame222
2006-10-16 12:50 am UTC (link)
Fair enough; it's true I haven't kept um; am not familiar with Zeese. will check him out.

mostly i go off what i think are peoples' silly behavior. and/or ineffectuality. which i'd seen a lot of.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ms_xeno
2006-10-16 06:22 am UTC (link)
Better to know you're ineffectual than to be in denial about it. ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]belledame222
2006-10-16 12:50 am UTC (link)
"kept up," either.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…